12-24-2016 Five take aways: What the [14-0 anti-settlement] UN Security Council resolution means – Michael Schaeffer Omer Man +972
https://972mag.com/five-takeaways-what-the-un-security-council-resolution-means/123897/
The key here is timing…The [Israeli] government is advancing a law to retroactively legalize the theft of Palestinian land. Senior ministers are declaring the end to the two-state era. Annexation of certain Israeli settlements is being seriously discussed. This was the Obama administration's — and the international community's — way of saying that it still cares. .. In response to the threat of European (and American) pressure over settlements and Israeli policy in the West Bank, Israeli leaders have in recent years suggested that Israel does not need Europe — that it can build alternative partnerships and alliances with non-Western countries like Russia, China, India, and certain African states…One perceivable consequence of the Security Council resolution is that it might embolden the International Criminal Court prosecutor to decide to open a formal investigation into the Israeli "war crime" of building, expanding and populating settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory…
Posted by Judith Ferster, AIME member
Comments
Post a Comment